Matt Ponchet vs Damien Clerc Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 08 Oct at 03:24 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Ponchet vs D. Clerc

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Ponchet 1 - 0 Clerc
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ponchet | 1 |
| Clerc | 0 |
Last 0 H2H Matches:
No past h2h happened.
M. Ponchet vs D. Clerc H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 51.63% (95-89) | Career Total W/L | 62.50% (5-3) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Ponchet vs D. Clerc Match Preview:
- In recent form, Damien Clerc has demonstrated superior performance on second serves, winning 44.59% of points compared to Matt Ponchet's 40.57%.
- When it comes to returning serves, Matt Ponchet shines, securing 47.78% of his opponent's second serve points, surpassing Clerc's 44.19%.
- On first serve returns, Clerc holds a slight edge, winning 28.44% of points, while Ponchet is at 26.14%.
- Both players handle pressure well, with Clerc saving 53.33% of breakpoints and Ponchet slightly better at 53.48%.
- Over the last year, Clerc boasts a higher match win rate of 83.33% compared to Ponchet's 59.09%.
- Where do they perform best? Clerc excels on Clay with an 83% win rate, whereas Ponchet fares best on Hard courts at the same percentage.
- Both players usually compete in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, but Clerc has a stronger recent performance at this level.
- Opponent quality also plays a role: Clerc has faced players with an average rank of 185.67 compared to Ponchet's 159.16.
- If the match proceeds to a deciding set, Ponchet has a significant advantage, having won 67% of such scenarios in the past year, while Clerc has won only 50%.
- Finally, consider current event form for in-form player indication as it might sway predictions.
Editorial Prediction (October 8, 2025, UTC):
Based on recent performance statistics, Damien Clerc excels on second serve efficiency, giving him an advantage during his service games. Meanwhile, Matt Ponchet demonstrates strength in return games, especially on second serves, which might trouble Clerc.
Both players show comparable resilience under pressure, as seen in their similar breakpoint saving percentages, yet Clerc has a superior overall win rate in the past year.
Surface preference suggests an edge for Clerc on Clay, while hard courts favor Ponchet. However, Ponchet has faced stronger opponents on average, which could be crucial in close matches.
Considering deciding set performance, Ponchet seems more reliable, which could influence things if the match is tight.
Evaluating these factors, Damien Clerc appears slightly more likely to win, especially if the match is on Clay or if his recent form holds fast, but Ponchet's ability to win key return points could make it competitive.
Matt Ponchet vs Damien Clerc Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Ponchet vs D. Clerc H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:15:7 | Average Match Time | 1:15:7 |
| 58% (31/53) | 1st Serve % | 51% (29/57) |
| 77% (24/31) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (21/29) |
| 64% (14/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (11/28) |
| 60% (3/5) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/3) |
| 44% (25/57) | Return Points Win % | 28% (15/53) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
M. Ponchet Recent Matches Played
D. Clerc Recent Matches Played

M. Ponchet vs D. Clerc Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51.63% (95/89) | YTD Win/Loss | 1st Match |
| 51.82% (214/199) | Sets Win/Loss | 1st Match |
| 51.02% (2076/1993) | Games Win/Loss | 1st Match |
| 55.70% (44/35) | Hard Win/Loss | 1st Match |
| 34.62% (9/17) | Clay Win/Loss | 1st Match |
| 53.16% (42/37) | Indoor Hard W/L | 1st Match |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 1st Match |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 1st Match |
| 439 | Aces Total | 1st Match |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 1st Match |
| 572 | Total Double Faults | 1st Match |
| 1:2:32 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 229.07 | Average Opponent Rank | 1st Match |
| 52% (4447/8517) | 1st Serve % | 1st Match |
| 69% (3089/4447) | 1st Serve Win % | 1st Match |
| 46% (1877/4071) | 2nd Serve Win % | 1st Match |
| 44% (337/761) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 1st Match |
| 40% (3248/8185) | Return Points Win % | 1st Match |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 1st Match |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 1st Match |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 1st Match |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 1st Match |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 1st Match |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 1st Match |
| 51.63% (95/89) | Futures W/L | 1st Match |
| 52% (95/184) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 1st Match |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 1st Match |
| 44% (21/48) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 1st Match |
| 47% (21/45) | Deciding Set Win % | 1st Match |
| 86% (98/84) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 1st Match |
| 14% (98/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 1st Match |
| 13% (86/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 1st Match |